Print This Article

Order of preference in selection of guardians; written request nominating guardian; requirements of writing, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-3

The ultimate test in determining who should be appointed as guardian is “who will best serve the interest of the adult.” There is, however, a priority list. Certain persons, if they seek to be appointed, may only be disregarding “upon good cause shown.” Since most guardianship hearings are audio recorded, caseful counsel will want to present evidence that will make it into the Court record estsblishing good cause for disregarding preference. The better practice would be to have the final Order reflect the Judge’s reasoning for disregarding preference.

O.C.G.A. § 29-4-3 provides:

(a) The court shall appoint as guardian that individual who will best serve the interest of the adult, considering the order of preferences set forth in this Code section. The court may disregard an individual who has preference and appoint an individual who has a lower preference or no preference; provided, however, that the court may disregard the preferences listed in paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of this Code section only upon good cause shown.

(b) Individuals who are eligible have preference in the following order:

(1) The individual last nominated by the adult in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of this Code section;
(2) The spouse of the adult or an individual nominated by the adult’s spouse in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Code section;
(3) An adult child of the adult or an individual nominated by an adult child of the adult in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Code section;
(4) A parent of the adult or an individual nominated by a parent of the adult in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of this Code section;
(5) A guardian appointed during the minority of the adult;
(6) A guardian previously appointed in Georgia or another state;
(7) A friend, relative, or any other individual;
(8) Any other person, including a volunteer to the court, found suitable and appropriate who is willing to accept the appointment; and
(9) The county guardian.

Disregarding statutory priority

In re Estate of Jenkins, 366 Ga. App. 628 (2023) is an example of when priority may be disregarded. Even if the person with priority fails to file pleadings, as shown in Kurtzman, the Probate Court must still explain its reasons for failing to appoint that person. In Wheeler, the Court’s findings of family acrimony were sufficient to appoint an independent this party as guardian.

Impact on Advance Directives

O.C.G.A. § 31-32-4 includes a form of Advance Directive for Health Care. Part Three of the Form allows the principal to nominate a guardian if one is required. O.C.G.A. § 31-32-6(c) provides: “An advance directive for health care which survives disability, incapacity, or incompetency shall not be revoked solely by the appointment of a guardian or receiver for the declarant. Absent an order of the probate court or superior court having jurisdiction directing a guardian of the person to exercise the powers of the declarant under an advance directive for health care which survives disability, incapacity, or incompetency, the guardian of the person has no power, duty, or liability with respect to any health care matters covered by the advance directive for health care; provided, however, that no order usurping the authority of a health care agent known to the proposed guardian shall be entered unless notice is sent by first-class mail to the health care agent’s last known address and it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the health care agent is acting in a manner inconsistent with the power of attorney.” In other words, if there is concern about the validity of an advance directive or if there is concern about abuse, then the Probate Court’s Order should address who will make medical decisions.

Legislative findings regarding health care choices

In 2007, as part of the Georgia Advance Directive for Health Care Act, the legislature made the following findings:

(a) The General Assembly has long recognized the right of the individual to control all aspects of his or her personal care and medical treatment, including the right to insist upon medical treatment, decline medical treatment, or direct that medical treatment be withdrawn. In order to secure these rights, the General Assembly has adopted and amended statutes recognizing the living will and health care agency and provided statutory forms for both documents.

(b) The General Assembly has determined that the statutory forms for the living will and durable power of attorney for health care are confusing and inconsistent and that the statutes providing for the living will and health care agency contain conflicting concepts, inconsistent and out-of-date terminology, and confusing and inconsistent requirements for execution. In addition, there is a commendable trend among the states to combine the concepts of the living will and health care agency into a single legal document.

(c) The General Assembly recognizes that a significant number of individuals representing the academic, medical, legislative, and legal communities, state officials, ethics scholars, and advocacy groups worked together to develop the advance directive for health care contained in this Act, and the collective intent was to create a form that uses understandable and everyday language in order to encourage more citizens of this state to execute advance directives for health care.

(d) The General Assembly finds that the clear expression of an individual’s decisions regarding health care, whether made by the individual or an agent appointed by the individual, is of critical importance not only to citizens but also to the health care and legal communities, third parties, and families. In furtherance of these purposes, the General Assembly enacts a new Chapter 32 of Title 31, setting forth general principles governing the
expression of decisions regarding health care and the appointment of a health care agent, as well as a form of advance directive for health care .

See 2007 Georgia Laws, p. 134.

(b.1) If no other person is available to serve as guardian of the ward, the judge may appoint a public guardian in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title. In the event the court determines that there is no public guardian registered in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title appropriately available to serve as guardian for a ward, the court may appoint the Department of Human Services as guardian. If so appointed, the department shall designate a representative of the department to provide guardian services who shall take the oath of guardianship. If, after having been so appointed, the department presents to the court a public guardian registered in accordance with Chapter 10 of this title or some other person suitable and appropriate to serve as guardian of a ward and willing to so serve, the court shall allow the department to resign and shall appoint such public guardian or such other person. If the department is appointed pursuant to this subsection, it shall be bound by all the requirements of this chapter, except that it shall not be required to post bond or pay any cost or fee of court associated with the guardianship proceeding. If the department is appointed pursuant to this subsection and enters into a contract with an independent contractor for the provision of guardianship services, the expense of providing such services may be paid for from state funds appropriated for public guardians under Chapter 10 of this title or, upon approval of the court, from the estate of the ward.

(c) At any time prior to the appointment of a guardian, an adult may nominate in writing an individual to serve as that adult’s guardian should the adult be judicially determined to be in need of a guardian, and that nomination shall be given the preference described in this Code section, provided that it is signed in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this Code section or the provisions of Code Section 31-32-5.

(d) At any time prior to the appointment of a guardian, a spouse, adult child, or parent of an adult may nominate in writing an individual to serve as that adult’s guardian should the adult be judicially determined to be in need of a guardian, and that nomination shall be given the preference described in this Code section, provided that it is signed in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this Code section or, if in a will, is executed in accordance with the provisions of Code Section 53-4-20.

(e) A writing nominating the guardian of an adult:

(1) Must contain an express nomination of the individual who shall serve as guardian and must be signed or acknowledged by the individual making the nomination in the presence of two witnesses who sign in the individual’s presence; and
(2) May be revoked by the individual by obliteration, cancellation, or by a subsequent inconsistent writing, whether or not witnessed.

Legislative History

This section became effective July 1, 2005. The legislature re-wrote Georgia’s guardianship and conservatorship code in July, 2004, with an effective date of Jul1, 2005, see Section 16 for effective date.  The statute was amended in 2005 (see Section 29) to provide for technical changes and corrections. Other amendments occurred in 2019 (available at Digital Library of Georgia), and in 2025 (HB 36 and SB 98).

Order of Preference in Selection of Guardians

BLOG POSTS

Rights of the ward; impact on voting and testamentary capacity; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-20

Georgia Guardianship law presupposes that the guardian must act in the best interests of the Ward. In that regard, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-20 states certain rights the Ward has. O.C.G.A. § 29-4-20 provides: (a) In every guardianship, the ward has the right to: (1) A qualified guardian who acts in the best interest of the ward; […]

Temporary medical consent guardianship; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-18

In some cases, no one can be found who will consent to medical procedures for a patient. O.C.G.A. § 29-4-18 provides a solution by allowing any interested party to file a petition to become a temporary medical consent guardian. It is worth noting that “a temporary medical consent guardian shall not be authorized to withdraw […]

Conduct of emergency guardianship hearing; limitations on emergency guardianship; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-16

If an emergency guardianship is warranted, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-16 sets the requirements for how the hearing is conducted. O.C.G.A. § 29-4-16 provides: (a) The court shall conduct the emergency guardianship hearing, at the time and date set forth in its order, to determine whether there is clear and convincing evidence of the need for an […]

Guardianship Appeal Statute is purely statutory

In Matter of Doze, 717 SW 3d 240 (2025), a Missouri Court affirmed the decision below appointing Queen Doze’s father as her guardian. The case began when Queen’s sister, Mariah Doze, filed a Petitioner for Appointment of a Guardian and/or Conservator. Mariah alleged that her sister, who was 21 years old, had an “intellectual disability […]

Prerequisite findings prior to appointment of emergency guardian; evaluation; notice; hearing; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-15

All things being equal, a Petition for Emergency Guardianship should be denied in favor of a permanent petition. The reason is because emergency petitions are usually ex parte proceedings while the permanent petition allows all interested parties to present their arguments. O.C.G.A. § 29-4-15 provides: (a) Upon the filing of a petition for an emergency […]

Petition for appointment of emergency guardian; requirements of petition; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-14

Petition for Appointment of Emergency Guardian An emergency petition usually begins as an ex parte proceeding. In limited circumstances, an emergency guardianship is necessary. However, in most cases, the petition should be denied in favor of a permanent petition under O.C.G.A. § 29-4-10. In In re Farr, 322 Ga. App. 55 (2013), the probate court […]

Requirements of order granting guardianship; service O.C.G.A. § 29-4-13

Requirements of Order Granting Guardianship The Order included with Standard Form 12 includes the required elements found in O.C.G.A. § 29-4-13, but it should be modified as appropriate. For example, if there is a mediated resolution, the terms of the settlement should be incorporated into the Final Order. O.C.G.A. § 29-4-13 provides: (a) The court […]

Judicial review of pleadings and evaluation report; findings; hearing, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-12

Judicial Review of Pleadings and Evaluation Report The prejudice is that petitions for guardianship and conservatorship should be denied. That is why clear and convincing evidence is required before one may be imposed. In Bookholdt v. Brown, 224 Ga, 737 (1968), the Court said: “Among our most cherished rights, as American citizens, are the freedom […]

Prerequisite judicial finding of probable cause; notice; petition; evaluations; reporting requirements, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-11

Prerequisite Judicial Finding of Probable Cause The presumption under Georgia law is that a guardianship is unnecessary and should be dismissed unless clear and convincing evidence is produced to support prerequisite judicial findings. For that reason, subsection (b) requires dismissal if the Court’s initial review of the Petition finds there is no probable cause to […]

Petition for appointment of guardian; requirements for petition, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-10

Last updated 9/5/2025 Petition for Appointment of Guardian In Georgia, a Petition for Guardianship is filed on Georgia Probate Standard Form 12. Care should be used because the forms are updated from time to time. As pointed out in other cases, an objection is not a Petition. The standard form generally requires a response to […]

Order of preference in selection of guardians; written request nominating guardian; requirements of writing, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-3

The ultimate test in determining who should be appointed as guardian is “who will best serve the interest of the adult.” There is, however, a priority list. Certain persons, if they seek to be appointed, may only be disregarding “upon good cause shown.” Since most guardianship hearings are audio recorded, caseful counsel will want to […]

Qualifications of guardians selected for adults, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-2

Only individuals or the Department of Human Services may serve as guardian. Although not expressly spelled out, only someone capable of fulfilling the duties of a guardian may serve, as explained in In re Estate of Jenkins, 366 Ga. App. 628 (2023). O.C.G.A. § 29-4-2 provides: (a) Only an individual may serve as guardian of […]

Prerequisite findings prior to appointment of guardian for adult; extent of guardianship, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-1

In Georgia, when determining whether a guardianship is necessary, the Court looks solely at capacity. Disability alone is not sufficient to impose a guardianship. There is no presumption that a guardianship is necessary. The appointment of a guardian must be in the Ward’s best interests. Further, Courts are required to structure the guardianship to encourage […]

Georgia Guardianship and Conservatorship, OCGA 29-1-1

Last updated 9/2/2025 Georgia Guardianship and Conservatorship When interpreting Georgia’s Guardianship and Conservatorship Code, definitions are critical. In Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 291 Ga. 359 (2012), the Georgia Supreme Court said “[T]he fundamental rules of statutory construction … require us to construe a statute according to its terms, to give words their plain […]

Probate Court properly exercised its discretion disregarding spouse’s statutory priority as guardian

In In re Estate of Jenkins, 366 Ga. App. 628 (2023), Gary Jenkins was living in an assisted living facility due to his severe memory and mental health problems. His spouse filed a Petition for Guardianship and Conservatorship after Mr. Jenkins impersonated a police officer and, as a result, was admitted to a memory care […]

Attorney’s fees can be awarded for frivolous claims and defenses in Probate Cases

The general rule is that “an award of attorney fees and expenses of litigation are not available to a prevailing party unless authorized by statute or contract.” Cary v. Guiragossian, 270 Ga. 192, 195(4), 508 S.E.2d 403 (1998). Georgia law generally follows federal law, allowing the Court to sanction parties and their attorneys for frivolous claims, defenses […]

What is Clear and Convincing Evidence?

In many cases in involving the Probate Court, the moving party must present clear and convincing evidence to prevail. But what does that mean? The standard was explained (at least in part) in In re Knight, 372 Ga. App. 485 (2024). Lillian Knight passed away, naming her daughter, Karen, as executor. Prior to her death, […]

There is no right to appeal a non-final Guardianship Order

In In re Bruni, 369 Ga. App. 488 (2023), the adult children of a proposed ward filed a petition for guardianship and conservatorship, and later filed an emergency petition. The proposed ward’s wife had been liquidating the proposed ward’s assets and lost $220,000 in one transaction. As a result the Probate Court “appointed an emergency […]

The person nominated by a proposed ward as Guardian or Conservator is not required to file pleadings to be considered

In In Re Estate of Kurtzman, 366 Ga. App. 725 (2023), Bette Kurtzman, 85 years old, had dementia and was residing in an assisted living facility. In December of 2020, Kurtzman’s daughter, Amy, and brother, Myron, filed a Petition for Guardianship and Conservatorship. Bette Kurtzman objected to the petition, alleging she had nominated her son, […]

Expert Testimony

As an initial proposition, all relevant evidence is admissible. See Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 402. In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Since then, expert testimony (subject to Rule 702) is not relevant unless it is “(1) scientific knowledge that (2) will assist the […]

2025 Legislative Changes to Georgia’s Guardianship and Conservatorship Law

2025 Legislative Changes During its 2025 session, the Georgia Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, two new laws impacting guardianships and conservatorships in Georgia. The first was HB 36. The second was SB 98. Both laws become effective July 1, 2025. HB 36 Code Section 29-4-1 now expressly provides there is no presumption that a […]

Planning for Adult Children with Disabilities

Planning for Adult Children with Disabilities Childhood Disability Benefits assist disabled children and adults who became disabled prior to age 22. Most begin with Supplemental Security Income, which is a monthly cash payment for individuals with limited income and few resources. Because a parent’s income and resources are usually deemed available to the child, SSI […]

Oath for Georgia Guardians and Personal Representatives

Before a guardian or the personal representative of an estate takes office, he or she must take an oath. The form is a standard form and can be found here. The oath is usually made in front of the Probate Judge or a clerk with the probate court, but it can be taken out of […]

Probate Court Reversed for Ordering Conservatorship Accounting Before Determining Identity of Estate’s Personal Representative

The Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of In re Bessie Mae Blake on February 20, 2024. Willis Blake was appointed as his mother’s conservator in 2000, but he was a poor record keeper. Although he was required to set up a separate account for Bessie Mae, keep records of expenses and file annual […]

Guardianship Evaluation is Admissible Regardless of Stipulation

Guardianship Evaluation In most cases I’ve been involved in, the evaluator’s report is stipulated into evidence or the evaluator is called as a witness. The reason is that the report cannot be cross-examined so the thought was that it’s subject to a hearsay objection. A recent case taught me otherwise (at least in Georgia). In […]

Georgia Court of Appeals Revisits the Preponderance-of-the-Evidence Standard

In White v. Stanley (Georgia Ct. App. 10/3/2023), Rhonda White appealed a jury verdict  in favor of the defendants relating to a motor vehicle collision. White argued that the trial court gave an improper jury instruction regarding the Preponderance-of-the-Evidence Standard. The trial court instructed the jury using the existing pattern jury instructions. However, the law […]

Sometimes You Must Say No

Sometimes you just have to say No “No” isn’t a four-letter word. Saying “no” isn’t necessarily bad and you shouldn’t feel bad when you say it. Part of saying no means taking a stand. It can mean standing up to injustice. For example, our legal system is, for the most part, dependent on people saying […]

elder law resources - ABLE Accounts - Additional Guidance - Trust Beneficiaries -Georgia Medicaid Manual - Nursing Home Cases

Family Acrimony Deemed Sufficient to Disregard Nomination of Guardian

In In re Wheeler (Ga. Ct. App. 6/6/2023), the Court of Appeals upheld the Probate Court’s decision that (1) there was sufficient evidence to impose a guardianship and conservatorship, and (2) that a neutral third-party be appointed as guardian instead of the person nominated by the ward. Because the reasoning in this case is “thin,” […]

elder law resources - ABLE Accounts - Additional Guidance - Trust Beneficiaries -Georgia Medicaid Manual - Nursing Home Cases

Approving Settlements for Minors

In April, 2022, we reported that HB 620 altered how settlements for minors can be approved under O.C.G.A. § 29-3-3, at least in cases where the trial court approves direct payment to a trust. Prior to passage of HB 620, Section 29-3-3 read as follows: 2021 Version For purposes of this Code section, the term […]

elder law resources - ABLE Accounts - Additional Guidance - Trust Beneficiaries -Georgia Medicaid Manual - Nursing Home Cases

Elder Law Mishmash June 2023

The following is a mishmash of information on various Elder Law, Special Needs Law, and Estate Planning issues. It also includes anything else we found interesting during the month of June, 2023. We will continue updating from time to time throughout the month. Last updated 6/8/2023. Keep in mind, you are using linked content at […]

elder law resources - ABLE Accounts - Additional Guidance - Trust Beneficiaries -Georgia Medicaid Manual - Nursing Home Cases

Failure to Admit Evaluator’s Report Required Reversal of Conservatorship Order

Ms. Humprey was a hospital patient and the University of Tennessee Medical Center filed a petition for Conservatorship. The petition alleged she was unable to make appropriate decisions regarding her treatment and medical care. Petitioner attached the report of Dr. Taylor Wright in support of its petition. The Court appointed a guardian ad litem and […]

elder law resources - ABLE Accounts - Additional Guidance - Trust Beneficiaries -Georgia Medicaid Manual - Nursing Home Cases

Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms Appointment of Guardian Despite Questionable Transcript from Probate Court Hearing

On September 15, 2022, the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a Probate Court decision appointing a guardian despite a spotty record of the proceedings below. In In re Guardianship of S.B., the proposed was suffered a traumatic brain injury. In 2004, the ward’s father filed a petition for guardianship and was appointed guardian. In 2007, […]

Brothers

Conservator has exclusive power to bring, defend or participate in lawsuits for a ward

in Hall v. Davis Lawn Care Service, Inc., 314 Ga. 488 (S22G0019 8/23/2022), the Supreme Court unravelled some messy litigation where a conservator was appointed for a minor, but was deemed by the lower courts as having forfeited his exclusive power to bring, defend or participate in legal proceedings for his ward pursuant to OCGA […]

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

Form: Consent to Criminal Background Check

Below is an exemplar consent to a criminal background check. These are required in most guardianship cases and some probate cases.

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

How to Communicate with Courts, Parties in Litigation and Others

There are times when formal “legal” communication is necessary. This post addresses several instances regarding how that can be done. It is not meant to be all inclusive and, in many cases, specific communication rules apply. Beginning a lawsuit: When you begin a lawsuit, a summons must be served on the Defendant(s). Generally, Rule 4 […]

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

Probate Court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law when requested

In the Estate of T.M.N. (Ga. Ct. App. 6/13/2022), Quanda Jessie served as conservator of her minor child’s estate and had done so since 2016. The primary asset in the conservatorship estate was a wrongful death recovery, although Social Security survivor’s benefits were also paid to the child. Jessie updated the asset management plan and […]

Ali

Conservator’s settlement for minor children upheld

In Smith v. Parks Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (Georgia Ct. App. June 8, 2022), the mother of five children was killed by her boyfriend while she was cleaning a room as a Hilton employee. The probate court appointed a conservator for the minor children who filed a Worker’s Compensation claim. The claim was settled for […]

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

Probate Court’s Order on Emergency Guardianship is not appealable

On May 20, 2022, the Georgia Court of Appeals issued its Order in In re Estate of Brenda Elizabether Strother (Ward) (Appeal No. A22A0210). There, two daughters filed a petition for emergency guardianship, alleging two members of Brenda’s Jehovah’s Witness church (Robertson and Lewis), named in a 2020 advance directive were refusing to authorize emergency […]

Elle

Elder Law and Special Needs Law News Roundup – 5-20-2022

We regularly post links to news articles and other resources related to Elder Law and Special Needs Law. We focus on general news, health and healthcare news, special needs news, events, government sources, financial and retirement news and legal news. Some cited resources are for professionals, but most are news or other helpful articles we […]

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

Appeal Challenging Georgia’s Equitable Caregiver Statute was moot

In McAlister v. Clifton (Ga. 4/19/2022), the Georgia Supreme Court heard a case challenging the equitable caregiver statute, O.C.G.A. § 19-7-3.1. There, the trial court awarded Wendi Clifton, McAlister’s domestic partner, visitation rights to McAlister’s adopted daughter, Catherine. McAlister contended the equitable caregiver statute was unconstitutional facially and as applied to Clifton. McAlister also appealed […]

Ali

News Roundup – 2/25/2022

February is American Heart Month! Read President Biden’s Proclamation on American Healrth Month 2022 We regularly post links to news articles and other resources we believe might be of interest to our viewers. We focus on general news, health and healthcare news, special needs news, events, government sources, financial and retirement news and legal news. […]

estate planning

Form: Guardian’s Personal Status Report

Guardians must file a personal status report within sixty (60) days after appointment, and then annually, reporting the ward’s location, condition and any unmet needs. Although these forms tend to vary from court to court, unless the court directs that a different form be used, the following is an example of what guardians must file: […]

Form: Conservator’s Annual Return (or Final Return)

Initially, a conservator must file an inventory and asset management plan within 60 days after appointment. Each year a conservator must file an annual return and a final return must be filed when the conservatorship terminates (or when after the ward’s death). Unless the applicable Probate Court directs that a different form be used, the […]

Appeal Route From Article 6 Probate Court is to Court of Appeals

Appeal Route From Article 6 Probate Court In Spence v. Dep’t of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, 359 Ga. App. 603 (2021), Jermaine Spense was involuntarily committed as a hospital inpatient. Spence sought review after the Department sought an order of continued hospitalization of Spence pursuant to OCGA § 37-3-83. On April 18, 2019, the […]

Conservator/County Administrator appointed ex-officio administrator of ward’s estate

In In re Estate of Brown, 357 Ga. App. 869, 850 S.E.2d 503 (2020), the Fulton County Probate Court appointed Ann Herrera as conservator for Leon Brown in 2011. After Brown died, Herrera filed a petition for letters of administration and Brown’s sister, Linda Glover, objected. Glover argued that Brown was a resident of Henry […]

Dad and son

Form: Health Values Questionnaire

In addition to a health care advance directive, one way to create evidence regarding your health treatment wishes and end-of0life wishes is to complete a health values questionnaire. One of the issues in Cruzan and Schiavo was the absence of adequate evidence demonstrating what the patient would want if she could speak for herself. Wouldn’t […]

Probate Court May Restrict a Conservator’s Power to Spend Ward’s Income

In In re Estate of Jenkins, 358 Ga. App. 254 (2021), the ward (Shaun Jenkins) sustained profound injuries as an infant due to malpractice. Jenkins received a settlement giving him annual income of $337,000 (or about $28,000 per month). The probate court limited the Conservator’s spending to $17,000. In 2019, the Conservator purchased a disabled-accessible […]

Form: Georgia Conservator’s Return

In Georgia, a Conservator must file an annual return and a final return. The current form appears below. For the most part, this form requires a check-book type entry, listing all funds coming in and all funds going out. One mistake many conservators make which adds to the book-keeping burden is maintaining multiple accounts. Multiple […]

Standby Guardians

A parent or a guardian (each a “designated individual”) may appoint a standby guardian of a minor. O.C.G.A. § 29-2-10. Upon determination that the designating individual is unable to care for the minor, the standby guardian, without judicial intervention, may assume all rights, duties and responsibilities of guardianship of the minor. The standby guardian must […]

Georgia State Medicaid Plan - Rules of Evidence - Scholarly Articles - Medicaid's Obligation to Respond to a Medicaid Application - Appeal Challenging

Involuntary Hospitalization and Treatment of Involuntary Patients

The procedure commonly referred to as a “1013” is governed by O.C.G.A. Title 37, Chapter 3 (§ 37-3-41 et seq).* The procedure applies to individuals who present a substantial risk of imminent harm to himself, herself or others, as manifested by either recent overt acts or recent expressed threats of violence which present a probability […]

Start Here

Enter your name and email address to keep up with what’s new at EZ Elder Law!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.