Cases

Miller v. Levering Reg’l Health Care Ctr., LLC, 202 S.W.3d 614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Miller v. Levering Reg’l Health Care Ctr., LLC

The resident had a history of falling, was left unattended in a dining hall, and fell, hitting her head. Following the fall, she was given a neurological assessment every four hours. However, testimony at trial showed that the standard of care was every two hours. Further, she was not assessed at all between midnight and 5:15 the next morning when she was discovered unresponsive. She died soon after transport to the hospital.

The jury awarded $10 on the wrongful death claim, $240,000 in aggravating circumstances damages, and $150,000 on the lost chance of survival. Defendants filed a motion for JNOV, a new trial, and remittitur, all of which were denied. On appeal the facility argued it was error to allow aggravating circumstance damages. The court of appeals rejected that argument, finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the facility knew it was dangerously understaffed, failed to take any action, and thus knew or had reason to know there was a high probability that a patient would be deprived of crucial treatment. The court rejected Defendant’s argument that the damages were excessive. The award demonstrated a calm and reasoned approach by the jury.

A mention of a deficiency was found to be non-prejudicial. Mention of subsequent remedial measures was waived due to no request for further relief despite a motion in limine. Finally, the court rejected Defendants’ argument that JNOV should have been granted because the plaintiff did not establish the standard of care for monitoring the dining hall. The court found the absence of evidence on that issue was not dispositive because “the jury was required to find negligence if Levering was negligent for failing to supervise Birkhead, failing to monitor Birkhead, or failing to provide sufficient staff. Finally, there was ample evidence that, if Levering had more employees, the necessary neurological assessments would have been done.”

Published by
David McGuffey
Tags: Falls

Recent Posts

Amount of compensation; multiple conservators; forfeiture; renunciation; O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50

Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…

7 hours ago

Generational Cohorts

Researchers use generational cohorts to identify and analyze changing views over time. A typical generation…

2 months ago

There are only six legal reasons to discharge a nursing home resident

Valid Reasons for an Involuntary Nursing Home Discharge One thing that strikes fear in the…

3 months ago

2026 Statewide Average Monthly Private Pay Rate for Determining Transfer of Assets

As of April 1, 2026, the Georgia Medicaid penalty divisor will increase from $10,798 to…

3 months ago

Medicaid Fair Hearing Dismissed Where Estate was Not Opened

How do nursing homes get paid? Sick people go to nursing homes and sick people…

5 months ago

Medicaid Verification: When the Agency is Required to Help

Some Medicaid classes of assistance do not require verification, but most long-term care classes of…

6 months ago