Cases

Emeritus Corp. v. Highsmith, 211 S.W.3d 321 (Tex. App. 2006)

Plaintiffs filed their expert report on August 29, 2005. The 120th day after filing the complaint was July 4th. Defendant assisted living facility moved to dismiss the complaint and the trial court denied the motion. On appeal, Plaintiffs argued that an abatement order extended the time for filing the report. The court held that the abatement order was not the kind of bilateral agreement required under the statute to extend the period of time for filing the expert report and therefore it did not extend the 120 day statutory deadline. The trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Good Lawyers Solve Problems, They Don’t Create Them

Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…

3 days ago

Stock Research

When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…

2 weeks ago

My Views on Investing

My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…

4 weeks ago

Amount of compensation; multiple conservators; forfeiture; renunciation; O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50

Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…

3 months ago

Generational Cohorts

Researchers use generational cohorts to identify and analyze changing views over time. A typical generation…

5 months ago

There are only six legal reasons to discharge a nursing home resident

Valid Reasons for an Involuntary Nursing Home Discharge One thing that strikes fear in the…

6 months ago