The trial court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment due to the limitations period having expired. Plaintiff argued the limitations period was tolled by T.C.A. § 28-1-106. The trial court rejected that argument because the resident had granted a durable power of attorney to Plaintiff prior to becoming incompetent. On appeal, the court found that the statute does not toll the limitations period only when there is no one to act for the plaintiff. Defendants also argued that the Uniform Durable Power of Attorney Act removed the disability by binding a principal regarding actions taken by an agent. Although the court agreed as to actions, the UDPAA does not bind a principal where the agent fails to take action. The complaint was not untimely because the limitations period was tolled. The judgment of the trial court was reversed. Decided: January 26, 2006. Appeal granted Sullivan v. Chattanooga Med. Investors, LP, 2006 Tenn. LEXIS 680 (Tenn. Aug. 21, 2006).
Opinion at: http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/OPINIONS/TCA/PDF/061/SullivantOPN.pdf
Affirmed at: http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/OPINIONS/TSC/PDF/072/SullivantOPN.pdf
Elder law attorneys sometimes find themselves in various types of litigation ranging from guardianship cases,…
Today the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment for next year, posting…
Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…
When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…
My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…
Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…