The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant, finding that the statute of limitations had run. The Court of appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling in January, 2006 after finding that disability tolls the statute of limitations notwithstanding the existence of a durable power of attorney. On appeal, the defendants argued the that the agent, Terry Sullivan, had power to commence the action that, thus, the statute was not tolled. After examining the language of the statute and the relevant case law, the Supreme Court found that Terry Sullivan was not “the person entitled to commence an action” within the meaning of the Tolling Statute. The person “entitled to commence an action” is more than just a person who has the authority to bring an action. The term clearly refers to the person who is under the disability, who suffered the legal wrong, and to whom the claim belongs.
The court expressly rejected the Defendant’s argument that there is no disability and that tolling does not apply while a durable power of attorney exists.
Decided April 24, 2007. Opinion at: http://www.tsc.state.tn.us/OPINIONS/TSC/PDF/072/SullivantOPN.pdf
The federal Medicaid statute authorizes the use of individual self-settled special needs trusts for individuals…
If someone is receiving Medicaid and was injured through the negligence of others, Medicaid asserts…
On April 22, 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced a new final…
In Creamer v. Manley, decided March 14, 2024, the Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment…
On February 21, 2024, the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of In Re…
The Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of In re Bessie Mae Blake on…