Medicaid eligibility determinations must be based on “ascertainable standards.” See J. Perkins, Issue brief: Appeal Rights and Medicaid Benefits citing Holmes v. New York City Hous. Auth., 398 F.2d 262, 265 (2d Cir. 1968). In Holmes, in the context of housing authority decisions, the Court said “due process requires that selections among applicants be made in accordance with “ascertainable standards.” In fair hearings, decisions
must be based exclusively on evidence introduced at the hearing. Section 431.244(a).
In early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment (“EPSDT”) cases, the standard in evaluating whether services should be covered is whether the specific services are necessary to correct or ameliorate the Applicant’s physical condition. Freels, at 450. See also 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(5).
Elder law attorneys sometimes find themselves in various types of litigation ranging from guardianship cases,…
Today the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment for next year, posting…
Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…
When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…
My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…
Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…