In Sereboff v. Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 (2006), an ERISA Plan sued the plan beneficiaries when funds were distributed to the Sereboffs without first satisfying an ERISA lien. The ERISA plan sued for injunctive relief, requesting a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction requiring the couple to retain and set aside at least $74,869.37 from the settlement proceeds to reimburse the plan for medical benefits. The district court approved a stipulation by the parties where the Sereboffs agreed to preserve $74,869.37 in an investment account until the issue was resolved. The Court held that the Plan could bring an equitable claim under § 502(a)(3)(B) of the ERISA Act. It then found that enforcement of an agreement to pay money upon receipt is an equitable action and that the agreement constitutes a lien. The Court distinguished the result here from Knudson because the plan sought specific funds, subject to the agreement, which were still in the hands of the Sereboffs.
Elder law attorneys sometimes find themselves in various types of litigation ranging from guardianship cases,…
Today the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment for next year, posting…
Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…
When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…
My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…
Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…