Special Needs Trusts

Sereboff v. Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 (2006)

In Sereboff v. Mid-Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., 547 U.S. 356 (2006), an ERISA Plan sued the plan beneficiaries when funds were distributed to the Sereboffs without first satisfying an ERISA lien. The ERISA plan sued for injunctive relief, requesting a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction requiring the couple to retain and set aside at least $74,869.37 from the settlement proceeds to reimburse the plan for medical benefits. The district court approved a stipulation by the parties where the Sereboffs agreed to preserve $74,869.37 in an investment account until the issue was resolved. The Court held that the Plan could bring an equitable claim under ยง 502(a)(3)(B) of the ERISA Act. It then found that enforcement of an agreement to pay money upon receipt is an equitable action and that the agreement constitutes a lien. The Court distinguished the result here from Knudson because the plan sought specific funds, subject to the agreement, which were still in the hands of the Sereboffs.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

SSI Decisions finding no penalty where beneficiary over 65 funds a pooled trust sub-account

The federal Medicaid statute authorizes the use of individual self-settled special needs trusts for individuals…

4 days ago

Example of Georgia Medicaid Lien Inquiry

If someone is receiving Medicaid and was injured through the negligence of others, Medicaid asserts…

4 days ago

CMS Announces Nursing Home Minimum Staffing Rule

On April 22, 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced a new final…

2 weeks ago

Dementia alone does not prevent someone from executing a valid Will

In Creamer v. Manley, decided March 14, 2024, the Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment…

3 weeks ago

Caveator deprived herself of standing by withdrawing her challenge to Will

On February 21, 2024, the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the case of In Re…

3 weeks ago