Cases

Rivera v. Simonetti, 2006 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2732 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2006)

Defendant moved to strike Plaintiff’s count alleging a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq. The allegations pled did not support the claim since they were general allegations of false reporting, and did not concern entrepreneurial or business aspects of running a nursing home. The motion was granted.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Medicaid Verification: When the Agency is Required to Help

Some Medicaid classes of assistance do not require verification, but most long-term care classes of…

7 days ago

Medicaid Estate Recovery – 50 States

The Estate Recovery Rules vary from State to State. The federal minimum requires states to…

2 months ago

Rights of the ward; impact on voting and testamentary capacity; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-20

Georgia Guardianship law presupposes that the guardian must act in the best interests of the…

2 months ago

Georgia Medicaid Applicants No Longer Required to Apply for Other Benefits

Medicaid is the payer of last resort so applicants have, historically, been required to apply…

2 months ago

2026 Community Spouse Income and Resource Allowances

Effective January 1, 2026, the Community Spouse Resource Allowance will increase to $162,660.00. The combined…

2 months ago

Temporary medical consent guardianship; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-18

In some cases, no one can be found who will consent to medical procedures for…

2 months ago