Cases

Lewis v. Delta Health Group, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50111 (D. Miss. 2006)

After Defendant removed the case to federal court, Plaintiff alleged it should be remanded because the amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000. The Court held that remand is not appropriate unless the Plaintiff can show that, at the time of removal, the amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000. Post-removal documentation regarding the amount in controversy is only accepted to clarify the jurisdiction amount if it was ambiguous. Because a final judgment disposing of certain claims had been previously filed in State court for $1,000,000, Plaintiff’s motion to remand was denied.

Published by
David McGuffey
Tags: Jurisdiction

Recent Posts

2027 Social Security COLA

Today the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment for next year, posting…

1 day ago

Good Lawyers Solve Problems, They Don’t Create Them

Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…

2 weeks ago

Stock Research

When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…

4 weeks ago

My Views on Investing

My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…

1 month ago

Amount of compensation; multiple conservators; forfeiture; renunciation; O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50

Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…

3 months ago

Generational Cohorts

Researchers use generational cohorts to identify and analyze changing views over time. A typical generation…

5 months ago