Cases

Lewis v. Delta Health Group, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50111 (D. Miss. 2006)

After Defendant removed the case to federal court, Plaintiff alleged it should be remanded because the amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000. The Court held that remand is not appropriate unless the Plaintiff can show that, at the time of removal, the amount in controversy did not exceed $75,000. Post-removal documentation regarding the amount in controversy is only accepted to clarify the jurisdiction amount if it was ambiguous. Because a final judgment disposing of certain claims had been previously filed in State court for $1,000,000, Plaintiff’s motion to remand was denied.

Published by
David McGuffey
Tags: Jurisdiction

Recent Posts

Generational Cohorts

Researchers use generational cohorts to identify and analyze changing views over time. A typical generation…

7 days ago

There are only six legal reasons to discharge a nursing home resident

Valid Reasons for an Involuntary Nursing Home Discharge One thing that strikes fear in the…

2 months ago

2026 Statewide Average Monthly Private Pay Rate for Determining Transfer of Assets

As of April 1, 2026, the Georgia Medicaid penalty divisor will increase from $10,798 to…

2 months ago

Medicaid Fair Hearing Dismissed Where Estate was Not Opened

How do nursing homes get paid? Sick people go to nursing homes and sick people…

3 months ago

Medicaid Verification: When the Agency is Required to Help

Some Medicaid classes of assistance do not require verification, but most long-term care classes of…

4 months ago

Medicaid Estate Recovery – 50 States

The Estate Recovery Rules vary from State to State. The federal minimum requires states to…

6 months ago