Kindred filed a motion for an emergency protective order after the trial allowed limited discovery on the sole issue of whether the arbitration agreement executed on behalf of the resident was void. Among the matters over which Kind sought protection was the relationship between Kindred and the service that administers the ADR program, as well as Kindred’s ADR training program. Kindred then petitioned the Court of Appeals for a writ of prohibition to prevent the trial judge from presiding over the challenge to the ADR agreement or from enforcing his discovery order. The court of appeals denied the application. The Supreme Court affirmed.
(Not reported in S.W.3d or on Lexis). Online at: http://floridaarbitrationlaw.com/cases/kindred_v_peckler.pdf.
ADLs and IADLs Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living describe basic…
Planning for Adult Children with Disabilities Childhood Disability Benefits assist disabled children and adults who…
Video Wills You might wonder whether you can make a video recording of yourself stating…
2025 Georgia Medicaid Transfer Penalty If an applicant for long-term care Medicaid (e.g., nursing home…
Recently, my dad died. While I was driving back from being sworn in as his…
In Georgia, an individual has legal capacity to make a Will "when the testator has…
