Defendant Barnes, an agency nurse, was found guilty in a criminal case of knowingly, intentionally and recklessly causing injury to a nursing home resident by cutting her feeding tube. The remaining Defendants in a civil case filed a Motion for Issue Preclusion against Barnes, seeking a conclusive determination that Barnes intentionally and surreptitiously cut the resident’s PEG tube. Plaintiffs, in responded, argued that Barnes was only convicted of neglect of person and that other charges were withdrawn. The Defendants presented no evidence to the trial court that Barnes’ conduct was surreptitious. The trial court denied their motion and, with permission, they appealed. On appeal, the court found that the criminal statute punishes intentional, knowing or reckless conduct and that the court could not bind the other litigants as Defendant requested without speculating as to whether the factfinder found intent or negligence. The trial court was affirmed. Decided: February 6, 2007.
The Estate Recovery Rules vary from State to State. The federal minimum requires states to…
Georgia Guardianship law presupposes that the guardian must act in the best interests of the…
Medicaid is the payer of last resort so applicants have, historically, been required to apply…
Effective January 1, 2026, the Community Spouse Resource Allowance will increase to $162,660.00. The combined…
In some cases, no one can be found who will consent to medical procedures for…
If an emergency guardianship is warranted, O.C.G.A. § 29-4-16 sets the requirements for how the…