Cases

Guillot v. Lecc-Baton Rouge, Inc., 2006 La. App. LEXIS 2923 (La. Ct. App. 2006)

Resident’s claim went to the medical review board. The review board’s decision was mailed to an attorney in California, where it was signed for by a postal employee and then was forwarded to an attorney in Louisiana. Under Louisiana law, the limitations period is suspended while a claim is with the review board, but the clock begins again once a decision is delivered. Suit was brought after the notice was received by the Louisiana attorney. The nursing home moved to dismiss, arguing that the claim was barred. The trial court granted the motion. The court of appeals reversed, finding that an individual not employed in the attorney’s office who is not authorized to receive the attorney’s certified mail cannot, by signing, cause the clock to resume.

Published by
David McGuffey

Recent Posts

Getting a recorded statement introduced in evidence

Elder law attorneys sometimes find themselves in various types of litigation ranging from guardianship cases,…

1 week ago

2027 Social Security COLA

Today the Social Security Administration announced the Cost of Living Adjustment for next year, posting…

2 weeks ago

Good Lawyers Solve Problems, They Don’t Create Them

Years ago I had the pleasure of knowing Arvin Reingold, a Chattanooga lawyer. He was…

4 weeks ago

Stock Research

When you're looking at investing, there is no substitute for qualified competent advice. Having said…

1 month ago

My Views on Investing

My thoughts on investing may or may not help you. I don't claim to be…

2 months ago

Amount of compensation; multiple conservators; forfeiture; renunciation; O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50

Compensation of the Conservator is generally addressed at O.C.G.A. § 29-5-50. There, the Code provides:…

4 months ago