Cases

Nursing Home Litigation, Jurisdiction: Adams v. Pathfinder Healthcare, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27774 (D. Ark. 2006)

Adams v. Pathfinder Healthcare

Defendant removed State Court action for negligence alleging there was federal jurisdiction because a federally appointed receiver was operating the nursing home. Relying on Gay v. Ruff, 292 U.S. 25 (1934), the court found that federal appointment of a receiver, without more, does not confer federal jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s motion to remand was granted.

Published by
David McGuffey
Tags: Jurisdiction

Recent Posts

There are only six legal reasons to discharge a nursing home resident

Valid Reasons for an Involuntary Nursing Home Discharge One thing that strikes fear in the…

1 month ago

2026 Statewide Average Monthly Private Pay Rate for Determining Transfer of Assets

As of April 1, 2026, the Georgia Medicaid penalty divisor will increase from $10,798 to…

1 month ago

Medicaid Fair Hearing Dismissed Where Estate was Not Opened

How do nursing homes get paid? Sick people go to nursing homes and sick people…

2 months ago

Medicaid Verification: When the Agency is Required to Help

Some Medicaid classes of assistance do not require verification, but most long-term care classes of…

4 months ago

Medicaid Estate Recovery – 50 States

The Estate Recovery Rules vary from State to State. The federal minimum requires states to…

5 months ago

Rights of the ward; impact on voting and testamentary capacity; O.C.G.A. § 29-4-20

Georgia Guardianship law presupposes that the guardian must act in the best interests of the…

5 months ago